Damien Hirst is a cock
I think we get the artists we deserve, which is why our money-grabbing, commercialised, shallow, turn of the millennia, Western society has produced Damien Hirst.
Last century, and for century’s before, most artists died in poverty usually syphilitic, earless, reputationless – apart from a reputation for opium and shagging prostitutes – they were on the fringes of society. OK not the court artists, but you get what I mean.
Now they are multi-millionaires, who employ people to produce their art in three factory workshops for them and swagger around threatening to sue 17 year old artists who make collages of their work and then getting them arrested.
Art has always involved copying and appropriating. It’s how the Greats learnt their craft. Mentors would encourage their protege to learn from them.
But not today. Today we live in a world where art is brand and brand is money and all that matters is how much Saatchi will pay for your pile of shite (which is my idea fuckers – any of you try and sell your own pile of shite I’ll sue!). In 2009, we get a multi-millionaire shitty brand artist like Hirst with a righteous desire to stamp on a 17 year old street artist.
So what happened? Street artist Cartrain made some collages using an image of Hirst’s disgustingly expensive diamond-encrusted skull, For the Love of God. These collages were put up for sale on an art website. Hirst reported him to the Design and Artists Copyright Society and sent a bundle of legal letters to Cartrain’s art dealer, Tom Cuthbert, at 100artworks.com.
After the legal threats, 100artworks.com surrendered the offending pictures to Hirst with a verbal apology. Cartrain, the artist in question took this all very well, and in the spirit of the Dadaists went to Tate Britain and stole a box of pencils part of Hirst’s £50m Pharmacy installation. Cartrain was arrested, released on bail, and is waiting to find out if he will be formally charged with causing damage to the artwork. His father was also arrested in connection with the theft from Tate Britain, on suspicion of harbouring stolen pencils probably.
It doesn’t feel a lot different from McDonald’s stopping local family-run businesses using the name ‘McDonald’s’. In fact there are a lot of similarities, as the McLibel Two will tell you.
So Twitter has been buzzing with #hirstisacock and some have been debating whether Hirst is a shit artist or Cartrain is a shit artist. Both may be true but neither are important. What is important is a rich, establishment, art figure trying to stamp on a child artist because he can. This is why Hirst is a cock. He is a bully, a hypocrite and a sickening anti-competition capitalist.
Cartrain and 100artworks.com have asked that bloggers and twitters bring attention to this story. Woop here it is.
September 7th, 2009 at 1:28 am
Err… hate to rain on your art parade, but Chris Ofili did the pile of shit artwork about 10 years ago. You're so derivative lol 😛
If you were to take that ple of shit and encrust it in diamonds however…
September 7th, 2009 at 7:42 am
That was elephant shit. I won't even attempt to compete…
October 30th, 2009 at 12:04 am
[…] commercialised, shallow, turn of the millennia, Western society has produced Damien Hirst. Damien Hirst is a cock | Vagina Dentata « I must be the last person in the country to touch this story, but I thought it […]
November 7th, 2010 at 8:16 pm
you also have to understand that not all artist start out rich, they go through a hell of a lot to get where they are and what they have. despite popular belief it does not just fall into their lamps. Suing a child is not cool, but it he has the rights to something then he has the rights thats what that means. And as for Damien Hirst the artist his work is a comment on capitalism, it is the people who buy that turn it into capitalism. Its iron and the fact that someone would pay that much for work shows the world just how corrupt people have become through that action.